Trap
NormalChain Disappearance
View:
4042
When a monster(s) with 1000 or less ATK is Summoned: Banish that monster(s) with 1000 or less ATK, then your opponent banishes all cards with the same name as that card(s) from their hand and Deck.
Chain Disappearance — Power Evaluation
Final Score: 62 ± 6 · Confidence: Medium
- Intrinsic: 61.5 · Deck: 61.9 · Meta: provisional
- Primary role: Removal · Secondary: Floodgate/Control
Why it scores here
Chain Disappearance is a reactive Trap: when a monster with 1000 or less ATK is Summoned, it banishes that monster and then forces the opponent to banish every card with the same name from hand and Deck. That converts one card into a removal plus a copy-denial effect, which earns the resource_economy and effect_interaction points. It is not a body, so material_utility is 0, and it builds no board on its own, so combo_conversion stays low. The 400-of-400 deck presence confirms it is practical and cheap to run, but it does not on its own prove strength, and the high deck count was not used to inflate the score.
Axis scores
| Axis | Score | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Accessibility | 70 | A Trap must be set in the backrow before it can act, so it is not live in an opening hand; the 400 of 400 sampled decks running it (1.39 copies average, 64 archetypes) confirm it is a practical, reliably found card (observed). |
| Combo & Conversion | 35 | The card has no recorded boards (total_combos 0), so its conversion is text-only: it answers a low-ATK summon rather than building a board (inferred). |
| Resource Economy | 75 | One card removes the summoned monster and makes the opponent banish all same-name copies from hand and Deck, a favourable exchange of card for card (verified text; the copy denial is inferred to be a real advantage). |
| Effect & Interaction | 62 | It is a removal trigger restricted to monsters with 1000 or less ATK, so its reach is limited, but it is a flexible answer to a common class of summon (verified text). |
| Material Utility | 0 | It is a Trap card, not a monster, so it cannot be used as material (verified from card type). |
| Resilience & Flexibility | 50 | As a face-down Trap it can be negated in the chain by an opponent's interruption and needs a set turn; the evidence supplies no interaction data (inferred). |
| Deck-Building Efficiency | 80 | It is a generic Trap with an average of 1.39 copies per deck, no garnet or lock restriction, and a broad archetype spread (observed from decks_evidence). |
Calculation
Weight profile: 0.7 Removal + 0.3 Floodgate/Control. Intrinsic ≈ 61.5, Deck ≈ 61.9, Meta = provisional. Modifiers: Compactness (2). Final formula: 0.40*Intrinsic + 0.60*Deck
Strengths
- One card removes a low-ATK summon and makes the opponent banish same-name copies from hand and Deck, which is strong card economy.
- Very broad deck presence (400 of 400 sampled decks, 64 archetypes), confirming it is a practical, cheap, generic inclusion.
- Cheap to run, with no garnet or lock restriction.
Weaknesses
- Restricted to monsters with 1000 or less ATK, so it is dead against higher-ATK summons.
- Needs a set Trap in the backrow, so it is not live in an opening hand.
- No recorded combo boards, so its conversion value is text-only.
Counters / choke points
- Inferred: a face-down Trap can be negated in the chain by opponent interruptions that are not in the evidence.
Best use
Removal trap against low-ATK summons, with same-name copy denial. Decks: Diabellstar, Azamina, Hecahands, White Forest, Kashtira. Suggested copies: 1.
Evidence & gaps
- Verified: Card text: on a summon of a monster with 1000 or less ATK, banish it, then the opponent banishes same-name cards from hand and Deck.; Card type is Trap Card, so it cannot be material.
- Observed: Appears in 400 of 400 sampled decks, 1.39 copies average, 64 distinct archetypes.; No recorded combos (total_combos 0).
- Inferred: Copy denial is a real card-economy gain.; A face-down Trap is answerable by in-chain interruptions and needs a set turn.; Its practical use is against low-ATK summons across the sampled homes.
- Data gaps: no combos supplied, so combo conversion is text-only inference no banlist token, so 3 copies (unlimited) was assumed no usage statistics (StatisticsCard); inclusion is inferred from the deck sample only no rulings supplied; the card text names no controller for the summon trigger, so the timing is unverified